This act was the basis of regulatory power for the executive branch of the government to control electronic communications in the United States. Roosevelt administration, gave the president powers of control over the media under certain circumstances. The Communications Act of 1934 established the US federal government’s regulation of electronic communications by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). While the effects of shutting off information access are controversial, the topic of a kill switch does remain to be resolved. During the Arab Spring in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya access to the Internet was denied in an effort to limit peer networking to facilitate organization. The prospect of cyberwarfare during the 2000s has prompted the drafting of legislation by US officials, but worldwide the implications of actually "killing" the Internet has prompted criticism of the idea in the United States. If the public were massing on the streets of London, I believe that many internet providers would be happy to argue the legitimacy of such a penalty in court. Would the Government want to foot the bill for switching off a multi- billion-pound industry? If a notice is served on an ISP and ignored, the penalty is only a fine. The legislation also includes the requirement to make compensatory payments for loss or damage. Peter Gradwell, a trustee of the Nominet Trust, criticized the provisions in the Communications Act: Any decision to use them would have to comply with public law and the Human Rights Act. The powers are subject to review and if it was used inappropriately there could be an appeal to the competitions appeal tribunal. It would have to be a very serious threat for these powers to be used, something like a major cyber attack. A representative of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said in 2011 that: In the United Kingdom, the Communications Act 2003 and the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 allow the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport to suspend Internet services, either by ordering Internet service providers to shut down operations or by closing Internet exchange points. Similar Internet restrictions had previously been implemented during national emergencies to control the flow of information in the aftermath of terrorist attacks, originally without any clear legal grounding. The mechanism came to attention when Internet monitoring group Turkey Blocks detected a nationwide slowdown affecting several social network services on the eve of a major offensive during the 2016 Turkish military intervention in Syria. In June 2016, Turkey introduced an Internet kill switch law permitting authorities to "partially or entirely" suspend Internet access due to wartime measures, national security or public order. The Iranian Government activated the internet kill switch during the 2019-2020 Iranian Protests to prevent the organization of new protests. India sometimes terminates Internet connections in Kashmir and north eastern states. Main article: Internet censorship in India § Usage of Internet kill switch
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |